Spotlight on Market Access

  • Analysis Tallies Premium Impact of Provider Markups on Specialty Drugs

    If providers charged the same price as specialty pharmacies for specialty medications, $13.1 billion in spending on health insurance premiums and premium equivalents could have been avoided in 2024, according to a new analysis from the consulting firm Oliver Wyman, commissioned by AHIP.

    Provider-administered drugs can be delivered directly to clinicians from specialty pharmacies — known as white bagging — or providers can purchase the drugs directly and store the drugs until they are needed for patient care, which is called “buy and bill.” When the “buy and bill” method is utilized, the providers can charge a markup for the drug that is passed through to the patient’s bill.

  • Older Drug Gets New Indication for Use in Aggressive Cancer

    A drug that the FDA first approved more than a decade ago was recently approved for the first-line treatment of an aggressive blood cancer. One clinical trial showed that people on the agent experienced complete remission more than twice as often as those on a comparator therapy.

    On March 19, the FDA gave accelerated approval to Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.’s Iclusig (ponatinib) in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). The newest application had priority review and orphan drug designation, and its review used the Real-Time Oncology Review and the Assessment Aid.

  • Current Market Access to GLP-1s

    In March, the FDA approved Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy (semaglutide) for cardiovascular risk reduction, which could further boost the already-strong sales for the GLP-1 weight-loss medication.

    Specifically, Wegovy is now approved to reduce risk of “major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiovascular death, non-fatal heart attack (myocardial infarction) or non-fatal stroke” in adults who are either overweight or obese and have established cardiovascular disease, per a Novo press release.

  • Medicare-Negotiated Drugs May Not Get Favorable Coverage In Part D: Will CMS Intervene?

    Drugs in the Medicare price negotiation process will be at a disadvantage in Part D plans because their lack of manufacturer rebates and discounts will mean lower profits for plans and more pressure on premiums relative to competitors.

    The realization is more dreary news for products that end up in the crosshairs of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) pricing process, even though the law requires Part D plans to cover negotiated drugs. There is no requirement that plans put those products on a preferred formulary tier, nor are there limits on utilization management tools like prior authorization or step therapy that plans can impose.
  • Budgets Propose Eliminating Interchangeability Status for Biosimilars

    When then-President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law on March 23, 2010, he established the 351(k) biosimilar pathway via the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which amended the Public Health Service (PHS) Act. Since then, the FDA has approved almost 50 biosimilars, with about one-fifth of those gaining interchangeable status. That distinction, however, has been increasingly under fire, most recently in President Biden’s fiscal year (FY) 2025 budget, which proposes eliminating the interchangeability designation entirely. That could help boost uptake of biosimilars, resulting in prescription drug savings, say some industry experts.

    In contrast to the EU, whose European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA) clarified in September 2022 that all biosimilars approved in the EU are interchangeable, the FDA has created two levels of biosimilars: biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars.
×