Health Plan Weekly
-
Surveys Show Plan Sponsors Are More Hesitant to Shift Costs to Employees
Two recent surveys from KFF and WTW indicate employer-sponsored health plans are concerned with rising health care costs, driven by factors such as inflation, increased utilization and rising prescription drug expenditures. However, the results suggest that employers are becoming more hesitant to raise health insurance costs for workers at a higher rate than their salary increases.
While the average annual family premiums for employer-sponsored coverage increased 7% this year to $23,968 after not increasing a year ago, according to the KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey, workers’ average wages increased 5.2% and inflation was up by 5.8%. During the past five years, premiums increased 22%, while wages rose by 27% and inflation increased 21%.
-
Employer Plans in 2023: Average Premium Rises 7%, Abortion Coverage Remains Limited
The average annual premium for employer-sponsored health insurance in 2023 was $8,435 for single coverage and $23,968 for family coverage, a 7% increase from 2022, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation 2023 Employer Health Benefits Survey. On average, premiums for single and family coverage grew 22% since 2018. Over the past 10 years, the growth seen in the average premium for family coverage outpaced the rate of inflation (47% vs. 30%), whereas the average family premium and average wages grew at comparable rates (47% vs. 42%). -
News Briefs: Benchmark ACA Premium to Rise 4% in 2024
In 2024, the average monthly premium for a benchmark silver plan on the federal Affordable Care Act exchange will rise by 4% compared to 2023, CMS revealed on Oct. 25. Premiums for a benchmark plan, or the average second-lowest-cost silver tier plan, are used to calculate advance premium tax credits (APTC) that rise in tandem with premium rates. CMS noted that the year-over-year benchmark plan premium increase of 4% between 2023 and 2024 is the same as the increase seen between 2022 and 2023. Also continuing next year will be enhanced subsidies that make ACA exchange plans much more affordable than they were before the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021. To that end, the average benchmark plan rate after premium tax credits are applied, for a 40-year-old at 150% of the federal poverty level, will continue to be $0 in 2024 — compared to $55 before ARPA was enacted. -
SCOTUS Cases Could Create ‘Fractured’ Health Care Policy Landscape
In January, the U.S. Supreme Court is slated to hear two cases brought by fishing companies that, at first glance, would seem to have nothing to do with health insurers. However, the outcome of those cases could profoundly change how insurers — and companies of all stripes — interact with the many regulations that govern their businesses.
That’s because the cases — Loper Bright Enterprises, et al. v. Gina Raimondo and Relentless Inc., et al. v. Dept. of Commerce, et al — concern a legal doctrine known as Chevron deference, which for decades has given federal agencies considerable leeway when interpreting laws via rulemaking. If the high court strikes down that longstanding legal precedent, the regulatory landscape that governs every industry could become much more chaotic, legal experts tell AIS Health, a division of MMIT.
-
Elevance Shines with Strong 3Q Results Despite Falling Stars
Elevance Health Inc., the parent company of Anthem, enjoyed a strong third quarter, raising its end-of-year earnings guidance and completing a round of stock buybacks. The firm cited a strategic review — which involved layoffs and slashing real estate costs — as a key reason for the results. However, the positive results were dampened by Anthem plans’ middling performance in the newly released 2024 edition of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings, which drew scrutiny from Wall Street.
The strategic review yielded a $697 million boost to the quarter’s balance sheet, with an Elevance press release touting “the write-off of certain information technology assets and contract exit costs, a reduction in staff including the relocation of certain job functions, and the impairment of assets associated with the closure or partial closure of data centers and offices.”